Pavel A asked:
I’m trying to configure a 2 node cluster with shared storage, but the configuration is probably little unusual. It is described below:
- Both nodes have access to a shared storage that has a number of drives. To cluster nodes they appear as local (SAN type of connection).
- Node A is going to use half of those drives to assemble a s/w RAID (let’s name it SW_RAID1). On top of this s/w RAID there going to be LVM (say VG-1).
Same for Node B except for that Node B creates its own s/w RAID (SW-RAID2) using other hard drives than node A.
- In case of a failure, the remaining node should take over all resources (both SW-RAID1 and 2 with VG-1 and VG-2 respectively).
The picture below illustrates the setup.
The question is: can I use plain LVM for this kind of setup or do I have to go with clustered LVM?
To my thinking I can use plain LVM because each volume group reseeds on an entity (/dev/md*) that is never going to be available on both nodes at a time (ensured by the cluster as it manages the above s/w RAIDs), so from LVM’s perspective it is not even A/P.
Am I right? When answering, please, provide some reasoning if possible. Thanks!
If I’m reading your question right, I think you’re looking for DRBD. This will transparently keep the two servers’ disks in sync, allowing one to fail over to the other without data loss.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.